Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) vs India: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
48.68
in 2023
India
53.7
in 2023
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
7th
India rank
4th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 53.7 against 48.68 in Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG), a difference of 5.02.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and India ranks 4th of 155 groups.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.07 | 50.05 | 4.98 | India |
| 2010s | 46.03 | 50.79 | 4.76 | India |
| 2020s | 48.01 | 52.98 | 4.97 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) or India?
- India, at 53.7 against 48.68 in Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and India?
- 5.02, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and India?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and India rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and India ranks 4th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.