Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) vs Congo: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
48.68
in 2023
Congo
46.7
in 2023
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
7th
Congo rank
9th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates) over time
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
- Congo
How they compare
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 48.68 against 46.7 in Congo, a difference of 1.98.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Congo ranks 9th of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.07 | 55.19 | 10.12 | Congo |
| 2010s | 46.03 | 49.67 | 3.64 | Congo |
| 2020s | 48.01 | 46.92 | 1.08 | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) or Congo?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG), at 48.68 against 46.7 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo?
- 1.98, with Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Congo ranks 9th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.