Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) vs Congo: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
48.68
in 2023
Congo
46.7
in 2023
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
7th
Congo rank
9th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
- Congo
How they compare
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 48.68 against 46.7 in Congo, a difference of 1.98.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Congo ranks 9th of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.07 | 55.19 | 10.12 | Congo |
| 2010s | 46.03 | 49.67 | 3.64 | Congo |
| 2020s | 48.01 | 46.92 | 1.08 | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) or Congo?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG), at 48.68 against 46.7 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo?
- 1.98, with Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Congo rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Congo ranks 9th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.