Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) vs Chad: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
48.68
in 2023
Chad
46.5
in 2023
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) rank
7th
Chad rank
10th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG)
- Chad
How they compare
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 48.68 against 46.5 in Chad, a difference of 2.18.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Chad ranks 10th of 155 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.07 | 55.06 | 9.99 | Chad |
| 2010s | 46.03 | 48.48 | 2.45 | Chad |
| 2020s | 48.01 | 46.25 | 1.76 | Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) or Chad?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG), at 48.68 against 46.5 in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Chad?
- 2.18, with Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Chad?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) and Chad rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Central and Southern Asia (UNSDG) ranks 7th and Chad ranks 10th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.