Caribbean (UNSDG) vs Kiribati: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Caribbean (UNSDG)
29.61
in 2023
Kiribati
26.9
in 2023
Caribbean (UNSDG) rank
91st
Kiribati rank
88th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Caribbean (UNSDG)
- Kiribati
How they compare
Caribbean (UNSDG) currently reports 29.61 against 26.9 in Kiribati, a difference of 2.71.
That makes Caribbean (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Caribbean (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Caribbean (UNSDG) ranks 91st and Kiribati ranks 88th of 155 groups.
Caribbean (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean (UNSDG) | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.16 | 25.21 | 3.95 | Caribbean (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 25.81 | 24.86 | 0.9534 | Caribbean (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 28.55 | 26.15 | 2.4 | Caribbean (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Caribbean (UNSDG) or Kiribati?
- Caribbean (UNSDG), at 29.61 against 26.9 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Caribbean (UNSDG) and Kiribati?
- 2.71, with Caribbean (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean (UNSDG) and Kiribati?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean (UNSDG) and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Caribbean (UNSDG) ranks 91st and Kiribati ranks 88th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.