Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Bosnia and Herzegovina
26
in 2023
Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)
30.22
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) rank
88th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 30.22 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 4.22.

That makes Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) ranks 88th of 194 countries.

Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) Difference Ahead
2000s 21.96 31.08 9.12 Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)
2010s 22.62 28.64 6.02 Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)
2020s 25.02 29.54 4.52 Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)?
Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG), at 30.22 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)?
4.22, with Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG) ranks 88th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bosnia-and-herzegovina/northern-africa-and-western-asia-unsdg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bosnia-and-herzegovina/northern-africa-and-western-asia-unsdg/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Northern Africa and Western Asia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed