Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Bosnia and Herzegovina
26
in 2023
Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
29.77
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank
90th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) currently reports 29.77 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3.77.

That makes Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)'s figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 90th of 194 countries.

Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) Difference Ahead
2000s 21.96 29.33 7.37 Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2010s 22.62 27.4 4.78 Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)
2020s 25.02 28.95 3.92 Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions), at 29.77 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
3.77, with Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions) ranks 90th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bosnia-and-herzegovina/middle-east-and-north-africa-unicef-prog-regions/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bosnia-and-herzegovina/middle-east-and-north-africa-unicef-prog-regions/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Middle East and North Africa (UNICEF Prog.regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed