Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Melanesia (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Bosnia and Herzegovina
26
in 2023
Melanesia (UNSDG)
29.16
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Melanesia (UNSDG) rank
92nd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Melanesia (UNSDG)
How they compare
Melanesia (UNSDG) currently reports 29.16 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3.16.
That makes Melanesia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Melanesia (UNSDG) has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Melanesia (UNSDG) ranks 92nd of 194 countries.
Melanesia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Melanesia (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.96 | 26.84 | 4.88 | Melanesia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 22.62 | 26.14 | 3.52 | Melanesia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 25.02 | 28.18 | 3.16 | Melanesia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Melanesia (UNSDG)?
- Melanesia (UNSDG), at 29.16 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Melanesia (UNSDG)?
- 3.16, with Melanesia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Melanesia (UNSDG)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Melanesia (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Melanesia (UNSDG) ranks 92nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.