Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kiribati: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Bosnia and Herzegovina
26
in 2023
Kiribati
26.9
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Kiribati rank
88th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 26.9 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.9.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Kiribati ranks 88th of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.96 | 25.21 | 3.25 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 22.62 | 24.86 | 2.24 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 25.02 | 26.15 | 1.12 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 26.9 against 26 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati?
- 0.9, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kiribati rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Kiribati ranks 88th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.