Bolivia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Bolivia
24.9
in 2023
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
28.87
in 2023
Bolivia rank
100th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank
97th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Bolivia
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) currently reports 28.87 against 24.9 in Bolivia, a difference of 3.97.

That makes Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.2 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.

Bolivia ranks 100th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) Difference Ahead
2000s 26.59 26.4 0.1947 Bolivia
2010s 25.24 25.82 0.5819 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)
2020s 24.7 27.89 3.19 Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Bolivia or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG), at 28.87 against 24.9 in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Bolivia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
3.97, with Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Bolivia ranks 100th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG) ranks 97th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bolivia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/bolivia/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand-unsdg/">Bolivia vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed