Belize vs Western Pacific (WHO regions): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Belize
21.3
in 2023
Western Pacific (WHO regions)
17.92
in 2023
Belize rank
135th
Western Pacific (WHO regions) rank
138th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Belize
- Western Pacific (WHO regions)
How they compare
Belize currently reports 21.3 against 17.92 in Western Pacific (WHO regions), a difference of 3.38.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Western Pacific (WHO regions)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 135th and Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 138th of 194 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Western Pacific (WHO regions) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.93 | 20.6 | 1.33 | Belize |
| 2010s | 18.32 | 17.8 | 0.5185 | Belize |
| 2020s | 20.38 | 17.58 | 2.8 | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Belize or Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- Belize, at 21.3 against 17.92 in Western Pacific (WHO regions) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Belize and Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- 3.38, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Western Pacific (WHO regions)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Western Pacific (WHO regions) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Belize ranks 135th and Western Pacific (WHO regions) ranks 138th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.