Barbados vs Oceania (UNSDG): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Barbados
20.1
in 2023
Oceania (UNSDG)
16.85
in 2023
Barbados rank
145th
Oceania (UNSDG) rank
143rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Barbados
- Oceania (UNSDG)
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 20.1 against 16.85 in Oceania (UNSDG), a difference of 3.25.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Oceania (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 145th and Oceania (UNSDG) ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Oceania (UNSDG) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.48 | 12.51 | 8.97 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 17.89 | 13.12 | 4.77 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 19.38 | 15.82 | 3.55 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Barbados or Oceania (UNSDG)?
- Barbados, at 20.1 against 16.85 in Oceania (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Barbados and Oceania (UNSDG)?
- 3.25, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Oceania (UNSDG)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Oceania (UNSDG) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Barbados ranks 145th and Oceania (UNSDG) ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.