Barbados vs ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Barbados
20.1
in 2023
ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)
16.85
in 2023
Barbados rank
145th
ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) rank
143rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Barbados
- ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 20.1 against 16.85 in ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC), a difference of 3.25.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 145th and ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.48 | 12.51 | 8.97 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 17.89 | 13.12 | 4.77 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 19.38 | 15.82 | 3.55 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Barbados or ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)?
- Barbados, at 20.1 against 16.85 in ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Barbados and ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)?
- 3.25, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Barbados ranks 145th and ESCAP_PACIFIC (PAC) ranks 143rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.