Barbados vs ECE_Euro area (EMU): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Barbados
20.1
in 2023
ECE_Euro area (EMU)
15.22
in 2023
Barbados rank
145th
ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank
148th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Barbados
- ECE_Euro area (EMU)
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 20.1 against 15.22 in ECE_Euro area (EMU), a difference of 4.88.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times ECE_Euro area (EMU)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 145th and ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 148th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | ECE_Euro area (EMU) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.48 | 10.46 | 11.02 | Barbados |
| 2010s | 17.89 | 11.56 | 6.33 | Barbados |
| 2020s | 19.38 | 14.27 | 5.11 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Barbados or ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- Barbados, at 20.1 against 15.22 in ECE_Euro area (EMU) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Barbados and ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- 4.88, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and ECE_Euro area (EMU)?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and ECE_Euro area (EMU) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Barbados ranks 145th and ECE_Euro area (EMU) ranks 148th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.