Australia vs New Zealand: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Australia
11.1
in 2023
New Zealand
12.4
in 2023
Australia rank
193rd
New Zealand rank
191st
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 12.4 against 11.1 in Australia, a difference of 1.3.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 193rd and New Zealand ranks 191st of 194 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.34 | 9.04 | 1.7 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 7.46 | 9.88 | 2.42 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 10.1 | 11.72 | 1.62 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Australia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 12.4 against 11.1 in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Australia and New Zealand?
- 1.3, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Australia ranks 193rd and New Zealand ranks 191st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.