Australia vs Guatemala: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Australia
11.1
in 2023
Guatemala
10.5
in 2023
Australia rank
193rd
Guatemala rank
194th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Australia currently reports 11.1 against 10.5 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.6.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.
Australia ranks 193rd and Guatemala ranks 194th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.34 | 15.34 | 8 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 7.46 | 8.6 | 1.14 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 10.1 | 9.65 | 0.45 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Australia or Guatemala?
- Australia, at 11.1 against 10.5 in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Australia and Guatemala?
- 0.6, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Australia ranks 193rd and Guatemala ranks 194th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.