Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) vs Denmark: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
11.31
in 2023
Denmark
17
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) rank
155th
Denmark rank
157th
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 17 against 11.31 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG), a difference of 5.69.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG)'s.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 155th and Denmark ranks 157th of 155 groups.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.63 | 13.12 | 5.49 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 7.85 | 13.61 | 5.76 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 10.36 | 16.07 | 5.71 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 17 against 11.31 in Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Denmark?
- 5.69, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Denmark?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) and Denmark rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Australia and New Zealand (UNSDG) ranks 155th and Denmark ranks 157th of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.