Asia (UNSDG) vs South Africa: Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49
Asia (UNSDG)
33.59
in 2023
South Africa
31.2
in 2023
Asia (UNSDG) rank
62nd
South Africa rank
63rd
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time
- Asia (UNSDG)
- South Africa
How they compare
Asia (UNSDG) currently reports 33.59 against 31.2 in South Africa, a difference of 2.39.
That makes Asia (UNSDG)'s figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was South Africa ahead.
Asia (UNSDG) ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 63rd of 155 groups.
Asia (UNSDG) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia (UNSDG) | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.34 | 30.1 | 1.24 | Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2010s | 31.1 | 27.09 | 4.01 | Asia (UNSDG) |
| 2020s | 32.88 | 30.07 | 2.81 | Asia (UNSDG) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Asia (UNSDG) or South Africa?
- Asia (UNSDG), at 33.59 against 31.2 in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Asia (UNSDG) and South Africa?
- 2.39, with Asia (UNSDG) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia (UNSDG) and South Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Asia (UNSDG) and South Africa rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
- Asia (UNSDG) ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 63rd of 155 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.