Antigua and Barbuda vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49

Antigua and Barbuda
20.3
in 2023
ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
16.02
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
143rd
ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) rank
146th

Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 20.3 against 16.02 in ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA), a difference of 4.28.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.3 times ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) ranks 146th of 194 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) Difference Ahead
2000s 21.99 18.68 3.31 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 18.07 15.68 2.39 Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 19.62 15.62 4.01 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49, Antigua and Barbuda or ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 20.3 against 16.02 in ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 between Antigua and Barbuda and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
4.28, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 143rd and ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA) ranks 146th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNICEF, published as Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49. Statizoid, drawing on UNICEF. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/antigua-and-barbuda/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-women-aged-15-49-modeled-estimates/antigua-and-barbuda/escap-east-and-north-east-asia-enea/">Antigua and Barbuda vs ESCAP_East and North-East Asia (ENEA): Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anaemia in women aged 15-49 (Modeled Estimates)
Source
UNICEF
Licence
UNICEF Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
349 places, 8,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed