Sao Tome and Principe vs Sur: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Sao Tome and Principe
26.5%
in 2019
Sur
14.9%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
5th
Sur rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Sur
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 26.5% against 14.9% in Sur, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.8 times Sur's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.2% | 15.6% | 9.7% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 26.4% | 14.6% | 11.8% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Sao Tome and Principe or Sur?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 26.5% against 14.9% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Sao Tome and Principe and Sur?
- 11.6%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sur?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sur rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.