Nicaragua vs Serbia: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Nicaragua
15.1%
in 2019
Serbia
15.4%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
117th
Serbia rank
115th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 15.4% against 15.1% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 117th and Serbia ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.0% | 15.6% | 0.6% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 14.4% | 15.2% | 0.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 15.4% against 15.1% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0.3%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Nicaragua ranks 117th and Serbia ranks 115th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.