Maldives vs Sur: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Maldives
26.7%
in 2019
Sur
14.9%
in 2019
Maldives rank
4th
Sur rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Maldives
- Sur
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 26.7% against 14.9% in Sur, a difference of 11.8%.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.8 times Sur's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.8% | 15.6% | 9.2% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 26.1% | 14.6% | 11.5% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Maldives or Sur?
- Maldives, at 26.7% against 14.9% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Maldives and Sur?
- 11.8%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Sur?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Sur rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Maldives ranks 4th and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.