Libya vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Libya
17.9%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
18.6%
in 2019
Libya rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
86th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Libya
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.6% against 17.9% in Libya, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 18.6% | 0.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 17.6% | 18.9% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Libya or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.6% against 17.9% in Libya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Libya and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Libya ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.