Kiribati vs Samoa: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Kiribati
23.0%
in 2019
Samoa
22.6%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
39th
Samoa rank
42nd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 23.0% against 22.6% in Samoa, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 39th and Samoa ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.9% | 22.4% | 0.4% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 23.2% | 22.8% | 0.4% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Kiribati or Samoa?
- Kiribati, at 23.0% against 22.6% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 0.4%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Kiribati ranks 39th and Samoa ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.