Kiribati vs Mali: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Kiribati
23.0%
in 2019
Mali
23.4%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
39th
Mali rank
36th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Kiribati
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 23.4% against 23.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 39th and Mali ranks 36th of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.9% | 21.8% | 1.1% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 23.2% | 23.2% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Kiribati or Mali?
- Mali, at 23.4% against 23.0% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Kiribati and Mali?
- 0.4%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mali?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Mali rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Kiribati ranks 39th and Mali ranks 36th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.