Kiribati vs North Korea: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Kiribati
23.0%
in 2019
North Korea
23.2%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
39th
North Korea rank
37th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Kiribati
- North Korea
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 23.2% against 23.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 39th and North Korea ranks 37th of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.9% | 22.1% | 0.7% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 23.2% | 22.7% | 0.5% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Kiribati or North Korea?
- North Korea, at 23.2% against 23.0% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Kiribati and North Korea?
- 0.2%, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and North Korea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and North Korea rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Kiribati ranks 39th and North Korea ranks 37th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.