Jamaica vs Rwanda: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Jamaica
14.2%
in 2019
Rwanda
14.3%
in 2019
Jamaica rank
136th
Rwanda rank
133rd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Jamaica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 14.3% against 14.2% in Jamaica, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 133rd of 194 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.6% | 13.7% | 0.9% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 13.8% | 0.2% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Jamaica or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 14.3% against 14.2% in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Jamaica and Rwanda?
- 0.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Rwanda rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Jamaica ranks 136th and Rwanda ranks 133rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.