Honduras vs Latvia: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Honduras
14.5%
in 2019
Latvia
14.5%
in 2019
Honduras rank
129th
Latvia rank
129th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Honduras
- Latvia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 14.5% against 14.5% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 14.9% | 0.3% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 14.4% | 0.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Honduras or Latvia?
- Honduras, at 14.5% against 14.5% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Honduras and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Latvia rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Honduras ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 129th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.