El Salvador vs New Zealand: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
El Salvador
11.1%
in 2019
New Zealand
11.3%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
183rd
New Zealand rank
181st
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- El Salvador
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 11.3% against 11.1% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 183rd and New Zealand ranks 181st of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.4% | 10.2% | 0.2% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 10.7% | 10.8% | 0.1% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), El Salvador or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 11.3% against 11.1% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between El Salvador and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- El Salvador ranks 183rd and New Zealand ranks 181st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.