Costa Rica vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Costa Rica
11.8%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
11.7%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
167th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
170th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 11.8% against 11.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 167th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 170th of 194 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.7% | 12.5% | 0.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 11.4% | 11.6% | 0.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Costa Rica or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Costa Rica, at 11.8% against 11.7% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Costa Rica ranks 167th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 170th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.