Congo vs Sur: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Congo
27.3%
in 2019
Sur
14.9%
in 2019
Congo rank
2nd
Sur rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Congo
- Sur
How they compare
Congo currently reports 27.3% against 14.9% in Sur, a difference of 12.4%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times Sur's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.7% | 15.6% | 10.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 27.2% | 14.6% | 12.6% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Congo or Sur?
- Congo, at 27.3% against 14.9% in Sur as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Congo and Sur?
- 12.4%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sur?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Sur rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Congo ranks 2nd and Sur ranks 2nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.