Brazil vs Chile: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Brazil
12.3%
in 2019
Chile
12.3%
in 2019
Brazil rank
159th
Chile rank
159th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Brazil
- Chile
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 12.3% against 12.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 159th and Chile ranks 159th of 194 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.6% | 12.6% | 2.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 12.1% | 0.6% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Brazil or Chile?
- Brazil, at 12.3% against 12.3% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Brazil and Chile?
- 0.0%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Brazil ranks 159th and Chile ranks 159th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.