Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Botswana
18.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
18.6%
in 2019
Botswana rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
86th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Botswana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 18.6% against 18.4% in Botswana, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.3% | 18.6% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 18.1% | 18.9% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Botswana or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 18.6% against 18.4% in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Botswana ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.