Barbados vs Malta: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Barbados
12.5%
in 2019
Malta
12.5%
in 2019
Barbados rank
154th
Malta rank
154th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 12.5% against 12.5% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 154th and Malta ranks 154th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 12.2% | 0.5% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 12.1% | 0.2% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Barbados or Malta?
- Barbados, at 12.5% against 12.5% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Barbados and Malta?
- 0.0%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Barbados ranks 154th and Malta ranks 154th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.