Barbados vs Japan: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Barbados
12.5%
in 2019
Japan
12.4%
in 2019
Barbados rank
154th
Japan rank
156th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Barbados
- Japan
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 12.5% against 12.4% in Japan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 154th and Japan ranks 156th of 194 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.7% | 11.9% | 0.8% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 12.1% | 0.2% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Barbados or Japan?
- Barbados, at 12.5% against 12.4% in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Barbados and Japan?
- 0.1%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Japan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Japan rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Barbados ranks 154th and Japan ranks 156th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.