Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Antigua and Barbuda
12.4%
in 2019
Barbados
12.5%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
156th
Barbados rank
154th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 12.5% against 12.4% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 156th and Barbados ranks 154th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Barbados in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.8% | 12.7% | 0.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 12.1% | 12.3% | 0.2% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), Antigua and Barbuda or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 12.5% against 12.4% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
- 0.1%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 156th and Barbados ranks 154th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.