AMR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AMR
12.1%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
26.5%
in 2019
AMR rank
7th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
5th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AMR
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 26.5% against 12.1% in AMR, a difference of 14.4%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.2 times AMR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 7th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th of 7 groups.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.9% | 25.2% | 12.3% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 12.1% | 26.4% | 14.2% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), AMR or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 26.5% against 12.1% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AMR and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 14.4%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AMR ranks 7th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 5th of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.