AMR vs Central African Republic: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AMR
12.1%
in 2019
Central African Republic
26.4%
in 2019
AMR rank
7th
Central African Republic rank
6th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AMR
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 26.4% against 12.1% in AMR, a difference of 14.3%.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 2.2 times AMR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 7th and Central African Republic ranks 6th of 7 groups.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.9% | 25.1% | 12.1% | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 12.1% | 26.1% | 14.0% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), AMR or Central African Republic?
- Central African Republic, at 26.4% against 12.1% in AMR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AMR and Central African Republic?
- 14.3%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Central African Republic?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AMR and Central African Republic rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AMR ranks 7th and Central African Republic ranks 6th of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.