AFR vs Maldives: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AFR
22.7%
in 2019
Maldives
26.7%
in 2019
AFR rank
2nd
Maldives rank
4th
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AFR
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 26.7% against 22.7% in AFR, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.2 times AFR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 4th of 7 groups.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.7% | 24.8% | 3.1% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 22.3% | 26.1% | 3.7% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), AFR or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 26.7% against 22.7% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AFR and Maldives?
- 4.0%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Maldives?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Maldives rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AFR ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 4th of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.