AFR vs Congo: Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)
AFR
22.7%
in 2019
Congo
27.3%
in 2019
AFR rank
2nd
Congo rank
2nd
Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- AFR
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 27.3% against 22.7% in AFR, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times AFR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 2nd and Congo ranks 2nd of 7 groups.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.7% | 25.7% | 4.0% | Congo |
| 2010s | 22.3% | 27.2% | 4.9% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49), AFR or Congo?
- Congo, at 27.3% against 22.7% in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) between AFR and Congo?
- 4.6%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Congo?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Congo rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- AFR ranks 2nd and Congo ranks 2nd of 7 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.