United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
United Arab Emirates
16.3%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
16.2%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 16.3% against 16.2% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.1% | 17.2% | 2.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 15.9% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
- United Arab Emirates, at 16.3% against 16.2% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.