Rwanda vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Rwanda
10.4%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
10.5%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
150th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
149th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Rwanda
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 10.5% against 10.4% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 150th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.2% | 12.0% | 1.3% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 10.4% | 0.5% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Rwanda or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 10.5% against 10.4% in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Rwanda ranks 150th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.