Nicaragua vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Nicaragua
10.3%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
10.5%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
151st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
149th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Nicaragua
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 10.5% against 10.3% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 151st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.1% | 12.0% | 1.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 9.2% | 10.4% | 1.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Nicaragua or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 10.5% against 10.3% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Nicaragua ranks 151st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 149th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.