Micronesia (country) vs Zimbabwe: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Micronesia (country)
16.4%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
16.2%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
92nd
Zimbabwe rank
95th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 16.4% against 16.2% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 194 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.9% | 17.2% | 3.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 15.4% | 15.9% | 0.5% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Micronesia (country) or Zimbabwe?
- Micronesia (country), at 16.4% against 16.2% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Micronesia (country) and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Zimbabwe rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 92nd and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.