Mauritius vs Samoa: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Mauritius
15.0%
in 2019
Samoa
15.0%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
110th
Samoa rank
110th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Mauritius
- Samoa
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 15.0% against 15.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 110th and Samoa ranks 110th of 194 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.2% | 13.9% | 2.7% | Samoa |
| 2010s | 13.3% | 14.1% | 0.8% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Mauritius or Samoa?
- Mauritius, at 15.0% against 15.0% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Mauritius and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Mauritius ranks 110th and Samoa ranks 110th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.