Latvia vs Peru: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Latvia
14.9%
in 2019
Peru
14.7%
in 2019
Latvia rank
113th
Peru rank
115th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Latvia
- Peru
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 14.9% against 14.7% in Peru, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Latvia ranks 113th and Peru ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.4% | 17.3% | 2.9% | Peru |
| 2010s | 14.6% | 13.9% | 0.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Latvia or Peru?
- Latvia, at 14.9% against 14.7% in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Latvia and Peru?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Latvia ranks 113th and Peru ranks 115th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.