Kiribati vs Oman: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Kiribati
18.8%
in 2019
Oman
18.5%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
62nd
Oman rank
65th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Kiribati
- Oman
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 18.8% against 18.5% in Oman, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oman ahead.
Kiribati ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 65th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.3% | 19.2% | 0.9% | Oman |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 18.1% | 0.4% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Kiribati or Oman?
- Kiribati, at 18.8% against 18.5% in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Kiribati and Oman?
- 0.3%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Oman?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Oman rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Kiribati ranks 62nd and Oman ranks 65th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.