Equatorial Guinea vs Sierra Leone: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Equatorial Guinea
24.6%
in 2019
Sierra Leone
24.9%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
14th
Sierra Leone rank
11th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 24.9% against 24.6% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 14th and Sierra Leone ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.7% | 23.2% | 0.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 24.4% | 23.9% | 0.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Equatorial Guinea or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 24.9% against 24.6% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.3%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sierra Leone rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 14th and Sierra Leone ranks 11th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.