Cuba vs Jamaica: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Cuba
12.3%
in 2019
Jamaica
12.9%
in 2019
Cuba rank
135th
Jamaica rank
132nd
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Cuba
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 12.9% against 12.3% in Cuba, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 135th and Jamaica ranks 132nd of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.0% | 13.6% | 1.4% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 12.5% | 0.2% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Cuba or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 12.9% against 12.3% in Cuba as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Cuba and Jamaica?
- 0.6%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Cuba ranks 135th and Jamaica ranks 132nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.