Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Costa Rica
10.1%
in 2019
Rwanda
10.4%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
153rd
Rwanda rank
150th
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Costa Rica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 10.4% against 10.1% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Rwanda ranks 150th of 194 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 13.2% | 3.0% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 9.3% | 10.9% | 1.5% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Costa Rica or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 10.4% against 10.1% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 0.3%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Rwanda ranks 150th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.