Costa Rica vs Nicaragua: Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)
Costa Rica
10.1%
in 2019
Nicaragua
10.3%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
153rd
Nicaragua rank
151st
Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) over time
- Costa Rica
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 10.3% against 10.1% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.2% | 10.1% | 0.2% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 9.3% | 9.2% | 0.1% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49), Costa Rica or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 10.3% against 10.1% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) between Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 0.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nicaragua?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Nicaragua rank globally for prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49)?
- Costa Rica ranks 153rd and Nicaragua ranks 151st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women (aged 15-49) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.